中国自主创新企业
3A质量服务诚信企业
国家级科技企业孵化器
重点培育项目
咨询热线:400-8338-918
  • 首页
  • 当前位置:首页 > 文献频道 > 临床内科学 > 文献详细

    文献频道
    • 临床内科
      内科学其他学科
      感染性疾病学
      风湿免疫病学
      分泌代谢病学
      心血管病学
      变态反应学
      神经内科
      肾脏病学
      血液病学
      消化病学
      结核病学
      呼吸病学
    • 临床外科
      泌尿生殖系外科学
      器官移植外科学
      心血管外科学
      外科学其他
      整形外科学
      烧伤外科学
      颅脑外科学
      神经外科学
      显微外科学
      普通外科学
      骨外科学
      胸外科学
    • 临床其他
      精神病与精神卫生学
      影像医学与核医学
      临床检验诊断学
      皮肤病与性病学
      耳鼻咽喉科学
      急诊医学
      老年医学
      口腔医学
      妇产科学
      麻醉学
      眼科学
      护理学
      肿瘤学
      儿科学
      其他
    • 基础医学
      人体解剖学和组织胚胎学
      病理学与病理生理学
      基础医学其他学科
      微生物学与免疫学
      医学寄生虫学
      医学心理学
    • 公共卫生与预防医学
      流行病与卫生统计学
      军事预防医学
      健康教育学
      卫生管理学
      妇幼保健学
      其他
    • 中医中药学
      中西医结合
      针灸推拿学
      民族医学
      中医临床
      中医基础
      中药学
      中医学
    • 药学
      药学其他
      临床药学
      生药学
      药理学
      药剂学
    《心血管病学》

    老年高血压患者动态脉压和脉压指数与颈动脉内膜-中层厚度的关系

    发表时间:2012-04-16  浏览次数:538次

      作者:许进,李鹏虹,陈佳,吴欣  作者单位:福建省老年医院心内科,福建,福州市

      【摘要】目的:探讨动态脉压及其指数与高血压患者颈动脉内膜-中层厚度(IMT)的关系。方法:测量159例研究对象的24 h动态血压,并计算动态脉压(平均收缩压-平均舒张压)及动态脉压指数(动态脉压/平均收缩压)。使用彩色多普勒超声检测颈动脉IMT。分析动态脉压指数与颈动脉IMT的相关性。结果:Pearson相关分析发现,颈动脉IMT与年龄(r=0.353)、平均收缩压(r=0.594)、平均舒张压(r=-0.355)、动态脉压(r=0.855)、动态脉压指数(r=0.883)有良好的相关性(P均<0.001)。进一步行多元逐步回归分析显示,颈动脉IMT与动态脉压及动态脉压指数具有显著线性关系(R2=0.789),动态脉压指数的标准回归系数(β=0.621)大于动态脉压的(β=0.284)。结论:动态脉压指数和动态脉压是评价颈动脉血管硬化的良好指标,动态脉压指数的价值更大。

      【关键词】 高血压,血压监测,便携式,颈动脉;动脉硬化

      Abstract:Objective:To study relationship among ambulatory pulse pressure (PP), pulse pressure index (PPI) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in aged patients with hypertension. Methods:The 24h ambulatory blood pressures of 159 subjects were measured, and their ambulatory PP [(mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) - mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP)] and ambulatory PPI (ambulatory PP/mean SBP) were calculated. Color Doppler ultrasonography was used to measure carotid IMT. Relationship between ambulatory PPI and carotid IMT was analyzed. Results:Pearson correlation analysis indicated that carotid IMT was correlated with age (r=0.353), mean SBP (r=0.594), mean DBP (r=-0.355), ambulatory PP (r=0.855) and ambulatory PPI (r=0.883), P<0.001 all. Multivariant gradual regressive analysis indicated that carotid IMT possessed significant linear correlation with ambulatory PP and ambulatory PPI (R2=0.789), and standardized regression coefficient β of ambulatory PPI (β=0.621) was higher than that of ambulatory PP (β=0.284) .Conclusion: Ambulatory pulse pressure index and ambulatory pulse pressure are good indicators for evaluation of carotid arteriosclerosis, and value of ambulatory pulse pressure index is more than.

      Key words:Hypertension; Blood pressure monitoring, Ambulatory; Carotid arteries; Arteriosclerosis

      Essential hypertension is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases in aged people, and increasing extent of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) have been regarded as evidence for prediction of target organ damage in aged patients with hypertension for a long time. A lot of researches proved that pulse pressure (PP) is an indicator for arteriosclerosis and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events[1]. As an early indicator for generalized arteriosclerosis, increased carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is also an independent risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events[2]. Relationship between them receives more and more attention[3,4]. Recent several years, some researches proved that pulse pressure index (PPI) can better reflect arteriosclerosis[1]. Through measuring 24h ambulatory blood pressure and carotid IMT in aged patients with hypertension, the study aims at explore relationship among ambulatory PPI, PP and carotid IMT.

      1 Subjects and Methods

      1.1 Subjects

      A total of 159 aged patients with hypertension from January 2010 to December 2010 were enrolled. There were 91 men and 68 women with mean age (75.6±8.95) years. Inclusion criteria: ① The patients should accord diagnostic standard of essential hypertension established by WHO and international society of hypertension (ISH) in 1999; ② Age ≥60 years old. Exclusion criteria: ①Secondary hypertension; ②Complicated with nephritis or nephrosis; ③Complicated with severe anemia, hyperthyroidism, severe valvular heart disease, acute myocardial infarction, congenital heart disease or diseases that affect PP.

      1.2 Methods

      1.2.1 Measurement of ambulatory blood pressure: all patients received 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) during admission. Ambulatory electrocardiogram blood pressure recorder was produced by Zhongjiankeyi limited company (type: CB-1804-B). From 8∶00 to 21∶00, blood pressure was measured and recorded every 30min; from 21∶00 to 8∶00, blood pressure was measured and recorded every one hour, and times of effective measurement would ≥90%. After records put into computer, 24h mean SBP (24hSBP) and 24h mean DBP (24hDBP) were calculated.

      1.2.2 Carotid color Doppler ultrasonography: color Doppler ultrasonography machine was produced by American GE company (type: LOGIQ9), and probe frequency for detection was 12 MHz. Detections were performed on common carotid artery (CCA), beginning of internal carotid artery (ICA, 1~1.5 cm over bifurcation level) and bifurcation site of carotid arteries, and mean IMT of carotid arteries was measured.

      1.2.3 Statistical analysis: SPSS 17.0 software package was used to perform statistical analysis. Measurement data were presented as mean value±standard deviation (x-±s). Pearson correlation analysis was used to find relationship among age, parameters of blood pressure and carotid IMT. If there were relationship, multivariant gradual regressive analysis was performed with carotid IMT as dependent variable and age and parameters of blood pressure as independent variables. P<0.05 was regard as possessing statistical significance.

      2 Results

      2.1 General data

      Carotid IMT, age and parameters of blood pressure were shown in Table 1.

      2.2 Pearson correlation analysis

      Carotid IMT was negatively correlated with 24hDBP, and positively correlated with 24 h SBP ambulatory PPI (r=0.883, P<0.001) and PP (r=0.855, P<0.001), were shown in picture 1 and 2.Table 1 General data of 159 aged patients with hypertension Table 2 Relationship among carotid IMT and other variables

      2.3 Mutivariant gradual regressive analysis

      Multivariant gradual regressive analysis showed that among the independent variables, only ambulatory PPI and ambulatory PP entered into equation;in model 1, only ambulatory PPI into equation, β=0.883(P<0.001), R2=0.778; in model 2, ambulatory PPI and ambulatory PP into equation together, R2 increased to 0.789. Therefore, ambulatory PPI and ambulatory PP possessed fine linear correlation with carotid IMT, and standardized regression coefficient of ambulatory PPI (β=0.621) was bigger than that of ambulatory PP (β=0.284), were shown in Table 3.Table 3 Multivariant gradual regressive analysis among ambulatory PPI, ambulatory PP and carotid IMT

      3 Discussion

      When large arterial compliance decreased, high SBP, low DBP and increased PP often occurred in aged patients with hypertension. Domanski et al[5] found that increased PP was independently correlated with increased carotid IMT, and it's independent predictive factor for carotid arteriosclerosis. Increased PP led to increase of shearing force and tension force on vascular wall and increased oxidative reaction on local intima, decrease of secretion of endothelium-derived relax factor, vascular intima dysfunction, and promoted occurrence and development of atherosclerosis. These may be lead to increase of carotid IMT[6].

      There still exist some limitations in using PP level as evaluating indicator. PP possesses changeability in an individual, and blood pressure could have big fluctuation within a day and there is bigger fluctuation after short time intervention of drug. Yang LP et al[1] suggested that evaluation of vascular stiffness with PPI may be more reasonable.PPI=PP/SBP, thus variation of PPI is significantly lower than that of PP. PPI is a nondimensional value from 0 to 1. Because vascular compliance is a function in mathematics for pressure, PPI can theoretically reflect vascular compliance, when it gets close to 1, vascular compliance becomes worse; when it gets close to 0, vascular compliance becomes better. This study indicated that age and SBP were positively correlated with carotid IMT, and DBP was negatively correlated with carotid IMT in correlation analysis; correlation coefficients of PPI and PP correlated with carotid IMT were bigger than those of other parameters such as blood pressure and age. Further multivariant gradual regressive analysis indicated that only PPI and PP entered into regression equation, and standardized regression coefficient of PPI was bigger than that of PP. So PPI is a better index than PP for predicting athersclerosis, similar with other researtches[7,8].

      In summary, compared with PP, ambulatory PPI possesses more superiority in evaluating arteriosclerosis in aged patients with hypertension, it′s better to combine PPI and PP to predict arteriosclerosis. Both indicators are noninvasive and easy to be applied and spreaded in primary hospitals.

      【参考文献】

      [1]杨鹏麟,徐定修,张素勤.脉压指数评价血管硬化的可行性探讨[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(6):334-337.

      [2]Bots ML, Hose AW, Koudstaal PJ, et al . Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study [J]. Circulation, 1997, 96 (5): 1432-1437.

      [3]Riley WA, Evans GW, Sharrett AR, et al. Variation of common carotid artery elasticity with intima-media thickness: the ARIC Study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1997, 23 (2): 157-164.

      [4]Inoue T,Matsuoka M, Nagahama K, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors associated with pulse pressure in a screened cohort in Okinawa, Japan [J]. Hypertens Res, 2003, 26 (2): 153-158.

      [5]Domanski MJ,Mitchell GF,Norman JE, et al. Independent prognostic information provided by sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure and mean arterial pressure in patients with left ventricular dysfunction [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999, 33(4): 951-958.

      [6]Ceravolo R, Maio R, Pujia A, et al. Pulse pressure and endothelial dysfunction in never treated hypertensive patients [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, 41 (10) : 1753-1758.

      [7]Zureik M, Touboul PJ,Bonithon-Kopp C, et al. Cross-sectional and 4-year longitudinal associations between brachial pulse pressure and common carotid intima-media thickness in a general population. The EVA Study [J]. Stroke, 1999, 30(3): 550-555.

      [8]许朝祥,王耀国,杜心清,等.主动脉脉压及脉压指数与冠状动脉病变严重程度的相关性[J]心血管康复医学杂志.2008,19(6): 535-538

    ↑上一篇:白细胞介素-6与慢性心衰的相关性及血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的影响
    ↓下一篇:性别对慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量和社会支持的影响
    全国咨询热线:400-8338-918
    地址:广州市天河区天河北路179号23层2322M房
      粤ICP备2024298770号